https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=endscreen&NR=1&v=UvF6KwcqRsg
Observations and reflections from Tibor R. Machan, professor of business ethics and writer on general and political philosophy, now teaching at Chapman University in Orange, CA.
Saturday, April 27, 2013
Wednesday, April 24, 2013
More Environmental Confusions
More Environmentalist Confusions
Tibor R. Machan
The
New York Observer reported in its April 15, 2013, issue (B 1) that
Leonardo DiCaprio is teaming up with Christie’s in New York City, to
hold a “major philanthropic auction.” I am not interested in the
details, which appear to me a kind of kiss up to fellow celebrities on
the political/cultural Left. But the following statement from the actor
is quite instructive:
The
Observer reports: ‘’The world’s forests, oceans and biodiversity
provide us with innumerable benefits like oxygen to breathe, clean water
to drink, and an abundant food supply,’ Mr. DiCaprio wrote in a letter
to artists asking for donations, on his foundation’s stationary, the
promotional item mentioned above. ‘And yet our planet and these vital
ecosystems that sustain life are under enormous pressures from modern
civilization’.”
Trouble
is that from an environmentalist viewpoint the enormous pressure of
which DiCaprio speaks is itself part of the environment, not some
independent natural force. In short, modern civilization is part of the
system! If it causes harm, that means the system itself is causing
harm.
This
is an inescapable fact. Environmentalists have no justification for
removing people, including the people of modern civilization, from the
environment. From their viewpoint, we are all in it together. We are
all parts of nature, as well.
Interestingly
a good many environmentalists are also animal rights champions and
their argument includes the idea that human beings aren’t different from
other animals in crucial respects. Tom Regan has argued that non-human
animals possess virtually the same level of consciousness as we do and
thus ascribing to them basic rights such as human beings have is
justified. The other main advocate of treating animals like humans are
treated, which justifies “liberating” them, holds that the feelings and
interests of non-human animals differ very little from those of human
beings, something that once again warrants ascribing to them basic
rights akin to those we ascribe to ourselves.
All
this suggests that animal rights advocates who are environmentalists
place human beings within the realm of nature. So the enormous pressure
from modern civilization--i.e., people--is actually just one additional
natural pressure, namely, evolutionary pressure.
The
bottom line is that for environmentalists the contributions people make
to environmental developments are natural ones and cannot be rejected
as something alien. Pollution, technology, modern agriculture, etc.,
etc., are all part of nature as far as environmentalist are concerned
(including Mr. DiCaprio). From his point of view, then, even the
environmental movement is but an aspect of nature! Its battles are
natural battles, no different in principle from hurricanes, earthquakes,
etc.
I
point out all this mainly to reduce the rhetorical heat emanating from
too many environmentalists whereby what they like about the world counts
as natural but what they do not counts as alien. That just will not
do.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)